Not long ago the CAA had ten teams, so it's hard to compare. The more teams, the fewer players honored per team. Aranguren and Davis being near equal could have made it less likely that either of them would be honored because voters who would be willing to honor a player on an 11th place team would have to pick one, and might not pick the same one as each other. Nobody can find out, but I am guessing that nobody voted for Aranguren and Davis on the Third Team or higher.
Before the first game started, there is an unusual problem with the statistics. The CAA linked to
https://stats.statbroadcast.com/broadcast/?id=584115 which has the CAA banner on top, Stony Brook's logo, and Delaware's logo, but the rest of the page shows Kentucky leading Connecticut 31-24, and clicking on the Notes/Docs tab shows that that game was on October 18, 2023 at AT&T Stadium. Having only the images be correct reminds me of Back to the Future Part 2 when Marty thought he had the sports almanac, but he had its cover around another magazine. That date is before the season started. I checked the team's schedules and searched online, and I did not find anything about an exhibition then. Furthermore, the statistics show a 31-24 score without anybody missing a shot, which is not realistic. I hope that the statistics will work for the proper game by the time it starts. The statistics URL for our game is
https://stats.statbroadcast.com/broadcast/?id=584116 which is 1 higher than the previous game, which makes sense. If you are ever bored, start with a link that posted in one of our game topics, make up a six-digit number less than that number, change the end of the URL to that number, and you'll get statistics from an old game that could be from many sports. For example, changing the first number from 5 to 1 went to a Volleyball game from October 7, 2017.
Edit: The Stony Brook vs. Delaware statistics now have the lineups for the proper game.
Edit: The statistics did something that I disagree with, and I wonder if they normally do that without me noticing, or they do not normally do that. Before any subs, all players played the same amount of time, but each team had one player credited with 3 minutes, and four players credited with 2 minutes. I am assuming they did that so the sum of the player's minutes is as close as possible to the amount of minutes the game had at that point multiplied by five. For example, after 2:15 was played, the sum of the player's minutes should be 11.25, so 11 when rounded to the nearest whole number, and 3+2+2+2+2 = 11. However, I think they should have credited all players with 2 minutes at that point and not cared if the sum was close to 11.25. When a significant amount of time is played, it's not an issue, although after some games somebody's minutes need to be adjusted up 1 or down 1 to make the team add up to 200, and I added the players on one team on ESPN that added up to something ending with 99 because one of the games did not have an adjustment up to make 200. By an adjustment, I mean something like taking a player who played 19:21 and crediting him with 20 minutes rather than the 19 if you round to the nearest whole number.
Delaware led 6-0, and now they lead 11-7. Delaware's leading scorer, John Camden, has not scored, but he has 2 rebounds and 3 assists.
Edit: Delaware has their largest lead at 27-20. Delaware's Erik Timko leads all players with 8 points, and Camden scored 5. Delaware has a great ratio of 6 assists to 1 turnover.
