Of course the fans would want what FDU did over what Merrimack had to deal with but that doesn't validate or invalidate an entire season from start to finish. It simply means that Merrimack had the better season, which it did -- by beating FDU out for both NEC titles -- and that FDU had its one shining moment at the expense of Merrimack not getting the opportunity that it should have had instead of FDU because of a terrible NCAA rule.HofstraPride1 wrote: Yes they did because of their historic win in NCAA tourney. Merrimack through no fault of their own had to stay home and not get reward of winning conference tourney, which beyond sucks for them and fans (we know feeling from a different perspective in 2020). If you asked fans of both teams whose season they would rather have answer isn’t even close.
One game in March does not validate or invalidate an entire season. If Merrimack went undefeated and then lost by one point in the NEC final and FDU would have gone 0-31 but somehow won its next five (NEC tourney, First Four, Purdue) it would have been an incredible, miraculous, historic, unheard of March run but still a terrible season that miraculously ended well.