With Cooks injured and Ray in foul trouble, Silverio was going to play. He didn't do much good or bad. Ray made 4 of 5 twos, and 2 of 6 threes. He raised his percentage shooting twos from .270 to .333. His missed two was a layup with 1:11 left. He scored 15. Carlos had 2 assists, but 3 turnovers and 2 fouls in 5 minutes doesn't make me want to see him play much. Burgess scored 7, and his previous season-high was 3. I wish he had more than 2 assists in 27 minutes, but on a good note he had no turnovers and his first block since the third game, which was at Iona. Cramer shot 3-4 and scored 6 in 12 minutes, but we were -12 when he played, and +18 when Iyiola played. stuball888 wrote about some players. Estrada shot 7-18, but that's okay when a guy has 7 rebounds, 7 assists, and few mistakes with 2 turnovers and no fouls playing the whole game. Those two games are tied for his season-high in minutes. JMU entered leading the CAA with 4.91 fewer turnovers than their opponents, and we were second with 4.64 fewer.Hofstra wrote: Nice win. Cant trust this team yet though, so I wont get too excited. Didnt like seeing Omar on the court at all though.
Our field goal percentage of .471 was better than our season's .462, our three-point field goal percentage of .357 was better than our season's .345, and our free throw percentage of .867 was better than our season's .778.
Each team had 13 rebounds at halftime, and we had 22 in the second half to finish with more, 35 to 27. It was the fewest rebounds we allowed since we allowed 24 in an 82-73 win at UNCW 22 games ago. We had a giant advantage in points off turnovers, 27 to 10. We dominated offensive rebounds 14 to 6 and second chance poinst 12 to 5. JMU had more bench points, 29 to 13. We had more points in the paint, 38 to 30, and it's good to make ten threes and have more points in the paint. We dominated fast break points, 18 to 5. We had 3 more assists, 19 to 16, and 2 more steals, 7 to 5, and each team had 3 blocks. JMU had for 21:40, was tied for 4:32, and we led for 13:29. There were 23 lead changes and 9 ties.
Here are how individual statistis changed:
Ray: 15.4 to 15.3 points, 4 rebounds decreased his average but it still rounds to 4.3, .404 to .415 field goal percentage, .455 to .448 three-point field goal percentage
Estrada: 13.9 to 14.3 points, 5.6 to 5.7 rebounds, 4.8 to 4.9 assists
Dubar: 12.7 to 13.1 points, 5.6 to 5.5 rebounds, 0.8 to exactly 1 assist, remains with exactly 1 block
Silverio: 11.8 to 11.3 points, 3.4 to 3.2 rebounds
Iyiola: 8.2 to 8.8 points, 8.7 to 9.3 rebounds, .649 to .646 field goal percentage (if we play and he plays, he will qualify for statistics leaders after Saturday)
Burgess: 0.8 to 1.3 points, 2.7 to 2.6 assists
Cramer: 5.9 to 5.9 points (6 today increased it by 0.005), 3.8 to 3.6 rebounds, .694 to .698 field goal percentage
How are how team statistics changed:
Points: 78.8 to 79.3
Points Allowed: 71.6 to exactly 72
Rebounds: 35.1 to 35.1 (35 today decreased it by 0.005)
Assists: 16.4 to 16.6
Fouls: 13.9 to 13.9 (14 today increased it by 0.005)
Turnovers: 10.3 to 10.3 (10 today decreased it by 0.02)
Turnover margin: +4.64 to +4.93 (+ means fewer than our opponents)
Assists/turnovers: 1.60 to 1.62
They did.Wags wrote: Let's if they get stops here down the stretch.
I had problems, but it wasn't blurry. It paused where I had to refresh, jumped to earlier parts of the game, and showed commercials during the game. I hope it was JMU's fault and those things won't happen to all games are Flo.Hof_Judge99 wrote: did anyone else have trouble with the feed being really blurry? Reception seemed way worse than the W&M game. Good thing Tuesday (covid permitting) is on tv.
Charleston won 65-61 hosting Elon, and Towson won 70-67 hosting Northeastern. Northeastern is the only team to play CAA games, and they're winless. JMU is 0-1 while leading the CAA in overall winning percentage. After Northeastern plays at JMU on Tuesday, one of them will be winless.